METR
Measures frontier-model capabilities, autonomy, and loss-of-control risks.
Berkeley · Independent nonprofitMAP THE ECOSYSTEM
Browse organizations by theme, discover AI safety projects and upcoming events, and find grants to support the work.
34 organizations · 6 themes
ORGANIZATIONS
Independent evaluators, research labs, public institutions, standards bodies, security groups, and field-building organizations.
Measures frontier-model capabilities, autonomy, and loss-of-control risks.
Berkeley · Independent nonprofitDevelops AI control methods, studies strategic deception, and investigates risks from misaligned AI agents.
Berkeley · Independent nonprofitStudies how to navigate rapid AI progress and the transition to a world with superintelligent systems.
Oxford + Berkeley + Remote · Research nonprofitResearches scheming, deception, evaluations, and frontier AI security.
London + San FranciscoIncubates and conducts technical AI safety research and red-teaming.
Berkeley · Independent nonprofitConducts safety research, builds the field, and develops safety standards.
San Francisco · NonprofitStudies how advanced AI systems can reliably act in line with human values.
Berkeley · AcademicFunds ambitious R&D, including large programs in scalable AI trust and coordination.
United Kingdom · Public R&DEvaluates advanced systems and builds public infrastructure for frontier AI security.
United Kingdom · GovernmentDevelops AI measurement, risk-management, evaluation, and interoperability standards.
United States · GovernmentRuns advanced programs in cyber defense, autonomy, resilience, and contested systems.
United States · Public R&DImplements EU AI governance and coordinates general-purpose AI oversight.
European Union · GovernmentBuilds cybersecurity capability, guidance, and cross-border operational cooperation.
European Union · AgencyLeads national cybersecurity work and practical assurance for emerging systems.
Singapore · GovernmentStudies AI governance, national security, institutions, and public policy.
United States · Policy researchDevelops frontier models alongside alignment, interpretability, and safeguards research.
United States + United KingdomStudies reliable, secure, and human-centered AI systems at deployment scale.
Global · Research labFunds and connects research on cooperation, coordination, and multi-agent safety.
International · NonprofitRuns open research programs that help new contributors produce useful safety work.
Remote · Research nonprofitOffers AI safety and governance courses, community, and career support.
London + RemoteStewards open agent protocols and neutral infrastructure across vendors.
Global · Industry consortiumTurns emerging agent and model threats into practical security guidance and tests.
Global · Open communityDevelops practitioner-led cloud and AI security controls, including MAESTRO.
Global · Industry nonprofitCatalogues adversarial tactics and techniques for machine-learning systems.
United States · Public-interest R&DCoordinates open, cross-company work on secure AI development and deployment.
Global · Industry coalitionPeople convening dialogue and cooperation, alongside researchers who help explain the US–China AI relationship. Track II means unofficial dialogue between experts. Open a card's contact details to see how the groups connect.
Advances AI safety and governance through research, policy advice, risk monitoring, and international dialogue, with deep knowledge of China’s AI ecosystem.
Beijing + Singapore · Social enterpriseCo-convened a Shanghai AI crisis-coordination workshop with Oxford AIGI, Carnegie, and Tsinghua. Kwan Yee Ng is also an Oxford AIGI affiliate.
Organizes the International Dialogues on AI Safety (IDAIS), connecting Chinese and international scientists around extreme AI risks and shared governance approaches.
UK + North America · In-person roles in London and San FranciscoIDAIS is its flagship programme. SAIF became independent from FAR.AI in 2025; Oxford AIGI co-hosted IDAIS London in 2026.
Combines Chinese-language research, fieldwork, and policy analysis with dialogue among US, Chinese, and international AI experts.
Washington, DC · Carnegie Endowment for International PeaceScott Singer connects Carnegie’s China AI Initiative with Oxford AIGI as a research affiliate. Carnegie also co-convened the Shanghai workshop with Concordia and Tsinghua.
Studies US–China relations and AI competition and cooperation. Brookings’ Foreign Policy programme convenes a bilateral dialogue on AI and national security.
Washington, DC · Policy researchBrookings and Tsinghua CISS have jointly convened the unofficial Track II dialogue since 2019. This is a separate series from IDAIS.
Public roles and sources reviewed September 6, 2026. Suggested contact roles do not imply a current request for support.Conducts international security research and convenes exchanges on AI governance, strategic stability, and US–China relations.
Beijing · 217 Mingzhai, Tsinghua UniversityBrookings’ Chinese partner for the bilateral AI dialogue. Xiao Qian also serves as Vice Dean of Tsinghua’s Institute for AI International Governance (I-AIIG).
Public roles and sources reviewed September 6, 2026. Suggested contact roles do not imply a current request for support.Studies international AI governance and potential cooperation with Chinese actors, and convenes researchers and policymakers across jurisdictions.
Oxford · Oxford Martin School, 34 Broad StreetCo-hosted IDAIS London with SAIF. Its China governance network includes Scott Singer (Carnegie), Kwan Yee Ng (Concordia), and Saad Siddiqui (SAIF).
Builds bilateral relationships through exchanges, delegations, public events, and Track II dialogues, including AI and the digital economy.
New York · 52 Vanderbilt Avenue, 16th FloorIts digital-economy dialogue partners with the China-U.S. Green Fund. Dennis Blair leads the US delegation; Xu Lin leads the Chinese delegation.
Digital-economy dialogue ↗Staff ↗Contact & in-kind support ↗
Public roles and sources reviewed September 6, 2026. Suggested contact roles do not imply a current request for support.Provides analysis of China’s AI ecosystem, emerging-technology security, and translations of Chinese policy documents.
Georgetown University · United StatesA source of evidence and policy context for understanding the bilateral relationship. Included for research expertise; no joint IDAIS organizing role is claimed.
Researches advanced AI, national security, international coordination, and US–China competition and its implications for global stability.
United States · Washington, DC mailing address; visitor office unverifiedIts International Strategy team provides policy context. Inclusion here does not imply a bilateral exchange programme or an IDAIS organizing role.
PROJECTS & INITIATIVES
Programs, collaborations, standards work, evaluation infrastructure, and research networks. Select one for its role, contribution opportunities, and key questions.
AI incident reporting and independent patient-safety investigation
Purpose-bound, expiring authority for autonomous AI agents
Virtual patching for AI-discovered critical-infrastructure vulnerabilities
Capacity, training, and tools for oversight of government AI use
Field builder, funder, and research network
Large R&D program and planned Arena
Open evaluation infrastructure and international testing
Standards, measurement, identity, and authority
Protocols, tool connectivity, gateways, and neutral governance
Advanced contested-autonomy and cyber R&D
Independent evaluation and strategic-behavior research
Foundational mechanisms and measurement
Empirical system-safety research and open tools
Threat models and practitioner translation
International testing, regulatory translation, and capacity building
Deployment laboratories and operational data holders
Project map seeded by Yondon Fu's ecosystem research and expanded from primary announcements, reviewed August 27, 2026.
CONFERENCES & EVENTS
Upcoming research, governance, and international dialogue events. Each listing links to its organizer and distinguishes announced dates from plans still taking shape.
September 28, 2026
Cambridge, Massachusetts
FAR.AI and the Cambridge Boston Alignment Initiative bring academic researchers together to explore AI safety research and form collaborations.
Invite-only; expressions of interest are reviewed on a rolling basis.
Official event details ↗September 30, 2026 · 8:00 am–2:30 pm Pacific
Online
A practical conference on organizational AI governance. Useful for governance implementation and professional connections; broader than frontier AI safety.
Free virtual conference; register through the organizer.
Official event details ↗October 12–14, 2026
Malmö Live · Malmö, Sweden
An interdisciplinary research conference on the ethical and societal implications of AI.
See the conference website for attendance and programme details.
Official event details ↗November 10, 2026
New York City
A broader US–China relationship-building event hosted by the National Committee on US–China Relations; not an AI-specific conference.
Tickets and sponsorship information are published by NCUSCR.
Official event details ↗November 16–19, 2026
Omni Providence Hotel · Providence, Rhode Island
Co-located data and AI governance conferences focused on organizational practice, data quality, and responsible deployment.
See the organizer for registration and programme details.
Official event details ↗December 6–12 (Sydney); December 9–13 (satellites)
Sydney · Satellites in Atlanta and Paris
A major machine learning conference with evaluations, datasets, and workshops. A broad research gathering; consult the programme for specific safety sessions.
Registration rules and availability vary by site; use the official conference website.
Official event details ↗2026 · Date not announced
Location TBA
Safe AI Forum’s official IDAIS page lists a sixth dialogue planned in the coming months. The latest completed dialogue was London, April 17–19, 2026.
No public registration details listed. Ask the organizers about participation or support.
Ask the organizers ↗Official sources reviewed September 6, 2026. Dates and attendance terms can change; confirm with the organizer before making travel plans.
FUNDING & GRANTS
Rolling funds, fixed grant rounds, research support, and compute programs. We distinguish what is accepting applications now from programs we are watching for reopening.
Offers funding and, where useful, dedicated engineering teams to help alignment researchers move promising agendas forward.
Provides compute resources for independent research on agentic systems, mechanistic interpretability, and alignment-adjacent topics.
Create a public proposal for donors interested in technical AI safety, AI governance, global catastrophic risks, and adjacent work.
Provides API credits for research on responsible deployment, risk mitigation, societal impact, and related independent investigations.
Supports work that could reduce catastrophic risks from transformative AI across technical research, policy, training, and field-building.
An experimental open grant round that distributed support across high-impact projects. The launch deadline has passed and the next round is being monitored.
A major public grant program for AI alignment research. The first application round is closed; future AISI academic grants are being monitored.
Status is checked against each program's official page every six hours; last successful check Sep 24, 2026. Grant terms can change, so confirm details with the funder before applying.
FIND YOUR WAY IN
Browse current paid roles, fellowships, volunteer projects, grants, and other ways to contribute across the ecosystem.